About the Magnetic Susceptibility Index for Gemstones

About the Magnetic Susceptibility Index Index

This Index is the first of its kind, as magnetism in gems has, with few exceptions, not been a subject of investigation by gemology researchers. The Index was designed as a reference chart for the magnetic susceptibilities of most gemstones, including many rare gems and minerals. Approximately 350 gem species, varieties and color variants are listed. It was developed by testing thousands of gem specimens from our private collection and other collections. The Index is an invaluable reference for anyone working with a hand-held magnet. However, it represents only a starting point in gemstone magnetism research.

The Index will only become comprehensive when the sample set is expanded to include many more samples, and when more investigators contribute to these findings. Those who wish to contribute to specific results listed in our Index may email the author at kirk@gemstonemagnetism.com.

Magnetic responses listed on the Index have also been added to the GTPro software offered by Gemology Tools Professional, and as an appendix in Geoff Dominy's Handbook of Gemmology. An advantage to referring to GTPro is that all gem identification properties (including magnetic response) are combined within a single at-a-glance reference for all gemstones.

© Kirk Feral 2010, All Rights Reserved. These materials may be duplicated for educational purposes only. No part of this website may be duplicated or distributed for commercial purposes, or posted to another website, without the expressed written consent of the copyright holder.

______________________

Response SI X 10 (-6)

Inert (diamagnetic) < 0 SI

Weak <20-80 SI

Moderate 80-140 SI

Strong 140-350 SI

Drags 350-1000 SI

Picks Up above 1000 SI

Fluorite

Comparing Magnetic Response to SI Measurements: While magnetic response measurements are gross approximations of magnetic pull, SI measurements are exact. Referring to the SI column on the Index helps us see quantitative differences in magnetism between different gemstones. The table below is an attempt to provide approximate correlations between the measured quantitative ranges and qualitative responses.

Spectrolite

Apatite

Synthetic Corundum

Qualitative

Quantitative

Tourmaline

Magnetic Susceptibility Index

Colorless Pollucite

Adamite, Analcime, Andesine, Aragonite, Beryl (Goshenite), Beryllonite, Bowenite, Calcite, Danburite, Datolite, Labradorite, Spinel, Petalite, Phenakite, Pollucite, Selenite, Natrolite, Spodumene, Topaz, Zircon

Go to:

Few colorless examples of allochromatic gems are listed on our Index because most are inert (diamagnetic). Some colorless diamagnetic gems not included on the Index that we have tested are listed below. All of these allochromatic minerals can also be found as colored gemstones, and some of those colored examples may be magnetic.

Index Specifications

Gem Types: Gems are listed alphabetically by species or group. Species names are represented in bold type, while variety names and color variations are in plain text. Group names are in enlarged bold type.

Cause of Color: Information about causes of color is based on a variety of sources found in published gemological literature (See Resources and Links), as well as our own research with spectroscopy. Cause of color should not be confused with cause of magnetism, although the two are frequently related, and at times directly related.

Response Range: The column labeled Response Range shows qualitative results using a hand-held magnetic wand. These are shown as Inert (diamagnetic), Weak, Moderate, Strong, Drag and Pick Up responses.

Standardized Testing: These responses are standardized to a 1/2"X1/2" N52 grade NIB cylinder magnet. The standard testing distance between the magnet and surface of the gem is about 1/2" (or less for very weakly magnetic gems). For Moderate responses, discrimination from Weak or Strong responses is somewhat subjective, as response ranges overlap.

Susceptibility: The degree of magnetic attraction (or repulsion) shown by a gem is measured as magnetic susceptibility. The column labeled SI X 10(-6) represents quantitative measurements taken by Kirk Feral using a Hoover magnetic susceptibility balance, which he assembled using an AO Spencer compound microscope as the base for the instrument in conjunction with a digital gem weight scale.

Measurements of gem magnetic susceptibility per unit volume, or volume magnetic susceptibility, are represented in standard units as "SI" (Systeme International d'Unites, or International System of Units) times ten to the minus 6th power. For example, 50 SI X 10(-6) = .000050 SI. This notation permits us to avoid placing decimal points within our measurements of weak paramagnetism. For details on how volume magnetic susceptibility is calculated from loss-of-weight measurements, see Hoover 2008.

If only one number (other than < 0) appears in the range column, then only one sample was available for measurement. Susceptibilities shown as < 0 (less than 0) indicate diamagnetic responses. The diamagnetic push force of gems is always weak, seldom exceeding 20 SI X 10 (-6).

We have not found any paramagnetic gemstones that measure more than 11,000 SI X 10 (-6), and most are less than 1,000 SI X 10 (-6). The measuring capacity of the balance ranges as low as 20 SI X 10 (-6) to as high as 86,000 SI X 10 (-6).

Calibrated Magnets: Calibrated magnets were used for all SI measurements. Calibration constants were developed using known copper sulfate crystal standards. Additional magnets calibrated to cobalt chloride by D.B. Hoover were provided by Hoover. We multiply the measured loss of gem weight in carats by the calibration constant of 868 for the 1/8" diameter X 3/8" magnet, and by a constant of 3,634 for the 1/16" diameter X 1/4" N52 magnet.

It's important to note that correlations between observed magnetic response and measured magnetic susceptibility are only rough approximations that can vary from stone to stone. This is because observations are somewhat subjective, and also because responses can be affected by shape, cut, size and weight of the gem. For example, if a gem is large and has a large table facet, it might show a Strong magnetic response when floated even though the measured susceptibility is only Moderate at SI 80.

As another example, a small gem under 1ct in weight may show a Drag response on a flat dry surface even though the measured susceptibility is only SI 300. Such variability between gems of different shapes, sizes and weights does not occur with quantitative magnetic susceptibility (SI) measurements using a Hoover balance.

^

< 2